Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?


Is State Tax Rates Hiking Up THE PRICE TAG ON Vaporizers?

The U.S. tobacco industry is fighting back against efforts by state regulatory bodies and consumers to modify the sale of electronic cigarettes. While vaporizers have already been around for quite some time and are becoming more acceptable in mainstream American life, the tobacco companies are determined to fight these efforts vigorously. They’ve made millions of dollars trying to defeat state taxing and regulation efforts. Now, they’re making their next move: challenging the legality of the taxation themselves. In a new legal filing, they’re claiming that the FDA over regulates and creates a “guaranteed” interstate transportation business. The filing happens to be being contested in the courts, and both sides expect a resolution sooner or later soon.

vaping online

State taxation uprights vaporizers by regulating their sale. It’s estimated that about twenty states have uprights to market vaporizer devices, including California, Colorado, D.C., Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington. These states have grown rapidly in recent years, so when a result, their cigarette tax rates are also growing rapidly. A number of these same states also have placed taxes on cigar and pipe tobacco. It appears that smoking just gets more costly, and that’s what the tobacco industry is shooting for.

In line with the filing with the FDA, the tobacco industry is being targeted unfairly. The tobacco industry does everything they can to fight against regulation of vaporizer devices. As we’ve seen, the U.S. Supreme Court has multiple times ruled contrary to the FDA over-regulation of cigarettes. These rulings have left the door spacious to regulation of vaporizer devices. The FDA claims that this over-regulation defeats the purpose of regulating and controlling the usage of vaporizers.

The truth is that the FDA itself isn’t even necessary to regulate or control these industries. Only state governments have that authority. It’s the state governments that impose their own taxes, and several states have imposed increased taxes in an effort to try to curb smoking. But the state governments are themselves at a disadvantage. They can not regulate wholesale prices since these prices are regulated by state laws. They also can’t tax the merchandise at a higher rate than the authorities does.

Also, the FDA itself isn’t directly mixed up in manufacturing of the vaporizer. Tobacco companies manufacture their very own products, and they are those that get sued by the states and levied taxes. The FDA merely approves or denies manufacturer licenses based on whether these manufacturers follow federal law. And if the manufacturer doesn’t, then the company doesn’t get its license.

So, the states that impose taxes on vaporizer devices don’t get the advantage of having a federal regulator, or perhaps a manufacturer that’s licensed by the state. So, instead, they find methods to increase taxes on the manufactures themselves! Which makes no sense. Why are these Electric Tobacconist manufacturers being targeted specifically? There’s no real reason.

THE MEALS and Drug Administration may be the federal body in charge of regulating pharmaceuticals, health supplements and cosmetics. It has the capacity to ban the production or sale of any chemical or substance that it determines is unsafe. So, why are states attempting to tell the FDA to focus on Vaping online users rather than tobacco manufacturers? The FDA knows that regulating diet pills isn’t likely to work because you can find no controlled weight loss supplements currently available to buy. And, even if there were, they couldn’t force food manufacturers to market diet pills containing things that are banned by state law.

So, instead, the states want to force the FDA to come up with some kind of rule or regulation which will require a manufacturer to market their devices in a particular manner, according to state regulations. Which makes no sense at all. It also flies in the face of the original purpose of the meals Drug and Administration Act. Why the FDA is targeting these devices is a question that only experts in the FDA can answer.